Start a conversation

Customs & VAT

Poland and Central Europe: the warehouse your customers never see

European fulfilment has moved east. Storing in Central Europe to serve Germany, France and Italy is now ordinary — and holding stock in a country generally registers you there, which is where the savings start to leak.

China → France

A European customer who orders on a Tuesday and receives on a Thursday assumes the goods were nearby. Increasingly they were not in that customer's country at all: they were on a shelf several far to the east, in a building the customer will never hear about, loaded onto a night trunk and delivered as a domestic parcel. For a Chinese seller, that geography is attractive for obvious reasons and expensive for reasons nobody mentions until the registrations arrive.

Why the European warehouse moved east

The reasons are industrial rather than clever. Warehouse space and the labour that handles it cost less in Central Europe than in the western markets being served, and warehouse work is labour intensive in a way that road transport is not. Large modern buildings are available near motorway junctions rather than squeezed into saturated metropolitan areas. And the road position is genuinely good: a single site in the region can reach the German consumer market overnight, and the French and Italian markets within a delivery promise customers accept. You trade a longer line haul, which is cheap per unit, against cheaper storage and handling, which is expensive per unit. For most catalogues the arithmetic favours the east.

Holding stock in a country usually registers you there

Here is the part that turns a logistics decision into a tax project. Bringing your own goods into a member state and holding them there with the intention of selling from that stock generally requires a VAT registration in that state, with periodic returns, independently of whether you have a company, an office or a single employee there. The movement of your own goods from one member state to another has its own reporting at both ends. None of this depends on making a sale in the storage country: you can hold stock in a country where you never sell anything and still be registered and filing there.

Keep that separate from producer responsibility, because the two are constantly confused. Collection and recycling obligations follow the country where the product is placed on the market — the customer's country — not the country the pallet slept in. A seller storing in Central Europe and shipping to German and French consumers therefore needs the German and French registrations, and the storage country gives no credit toward them. Conversely, being registered for VAT in the storage country does nothing for the waste streams of the markets it serves. Different obligations, different triggers, different countries.

Marketplace logistics programmes move your stock without asking

The programmes that store and ship on your behalf across several countries are built on a simple premise: the operator decides which building holds which unit, because that is how it compresses delivery times and costs. Accepting the default therefore means accepting that your goods may rest in several member states, chosen by someone else, changing over time. Each of those resting places is a potential registration in your name, with returns to file for as long as stock is there and sometimes a trail to clean up afterwards. The bill does not arrive as a line on an invoice. It arrives as the discovery that you have been storing goods in countries where you are not registered.

The setting can be restricted, and that is a configuration choice rather than a negotiation. It is priced, though: limiting where stock may sit usually raises the fee per unit or lengthens the delivery promise shown to the customer, because the operator loses the flexibility it was using to be fast. That is the real trade, and it should be made deliberately — decide which countries you are willing to be registered in, configure the programme to match, and revisit the decision when a market grows enough to deserve its own registration. What costs money is letting a default setting make a tax decision.

One warehouse or stock spread across several?

  • A single site is cheaper to run and easier to govern. One inventory, one set of instructions, one provider to hold accountable, one registration for storage. Errors are found once rather than repeated in parallel.
  • Spread stock buys a shorter delivery promise and resilience. A closer building means a faster arrival and a working alternative when one site is saturated, on strike or snowed in. It also multiplies registrations, filings and the risk of the same unit being counted in more than one place.
  • The delivery promise is the right starting point. Decide what you must be able to say on the product page in each market, then build the stock geography that supports it. Deciding the geography first and discovering the promise afterwards is how companies end up with warehouses they cannot justify.
  • Language is a hidden cost of being far away. A warehouse that cannot read the customer's language cannot handle a complaint, a mislabelled return or a customs query about a specific parcel. Somebody has to do that, and if it is not the warehouse it is you, at your time zone's disadvantage.

Returns are the part nobody plans

Western European consumers return goods, and the right to do so is part of the market you are entering rather than an anomaly to manage away. Those parcels travel back to wherever you told the customer to send them, which for a distant warehouse means a cross-border return flow on every single item, inspected and repackaged by people who may not read the paperwork, and a decision for each unit: back into sellable stock, discounted, or scrapped. A returned item that goes back into stock in a different country from where it was sold is another movement of your goods, with everything that follows. Companies that ignore this discover it as a pile in a corner of a warehouse they have never visited.

Before signing a warehouse contract or switching on a cross-border fulfilment programme, write down the list of countries in which your goods will be allowed to sit, and get the registrations in place before the first pallet moves there. Registering in advance is administrative work. Registering afterwards means declaring a period during which you were storing goods in a country that did not know you existed, and that conversation is never cheap.

Questions we get on this.

Our stock is in Poland but our customers are in Germany. Where do we register?

Probably in both, for different reasons, and that is the normal answer rather than a bad outcome. Holding your own goods in Poland to sell from there generally requires a Polish VAT registration with returns to file, whether or not you sell anything to a Polish customer. Selling to German consumers creates obligations that follow the customer, which can be met through a single declaration mechanism covering several countries in some situations and through a German registration in others, depending on how you sell and who is treated as the supplier. And the German producer responsibility registrations are required because Germany is where the product is placed on the market — the Polish warehouse is irrelevant to them.

Can we stop the marketplace from moving our stock between countries?

Usually yes, as a setting rather than a negotiation, and you should treat that setting as a decision taken by your finance side rather than by whoever opened the account. Restricting placement costs something: a higher fee per unit, a longer promise to the customer, or both, since the operator loses the flexibility it uses to be fast. The sensible method is to decide the list of countries you accept being registered in, set the programme to that list, and widen it market by market when the volume justifies the filings. What you want to avoid is the opposite order, where a default setting creates registrations nobody chose and the cost appears later as back-filings.

Is Central European warehousing really cheaper once everything is counted?

Often, but the saving sits in storage and handling, and the comparison has to include everything it moves. On the cost side, add the line haul to each market, the registrations and filings you must maintain, the cross-border returns, the price of the restriction you set on a fulfilment programme, and the customer service that the warehouse cannot provide in the customer's language. On the benefit side, keep the storage rate, the handling rate and the scale you get from one inventory instead of several. For a catalogue that turns over slowly and ships many units, the east usually wins; for a small, fast, high-value range sold mainly in one market, a warehouse in that market often wins instead.