A structure is a consequence of a commercial decision, not a substitute for one. Before comparing forms, answer this: who invoices the Chinese customer, and who holds the relationship?
The four options in plain terms
- No entity. You export and a distributor imports. Fastest, cheapest, and the distributor owns the customer.
- Representative office. A legal presence that cannot invoice. Useful for liaison and market work, limited by design.
- WFOE. A wholly foreign-owned company. Full control, you can invoice and hire — and you carry real accounting, tax and reporting obligations from day one.
- Joint venture. A local partner brings access; you share control and, eventually, disagreements. Sometimes mandatory by sector, rarely the right first move by choice.
| Structure | What it lets you do | Who holds the customer |
|---|---|---|
| No entity | Export; a distributor imports. Fastest and cheapest. | The distributor |
| Representative office | Liaison and market work. Cannot invoice, by design. | Whoever invoices |
| WFOE | Invoice and hire, with full control — and accounting, tax and reporting obligations from day one. | You |
| Joint venture | A local partner brings access; you share control and, eventually, disagreements. | Shared |
The recurring cost nobody mentions
Setting up a WFOE is a one-off project with a quotable price. Keeping it compliant — monthly filings, annual audit, a legal representative who carries personal responsibility — is an ongoing commitment. Companies that set one up « to be ready » often spend two years paying for readiness they never use.
A good rule: create the entity when an existing revenue stream requires it, not when a future one might. The paperwork is faster than the market.