Start a conversation

China market

The company chop: what actually binds a Chinese company

A signature is not what makes a Chinese contract binding. The red seal is — and there is more than one of them.

France → China

European contracts are bound by signature; the person signing represents the company and their authority is the question. Chinese practice is built around the company chop: a physical seal, registered with the authorities, whose impression on a document binds the entity. A contract with a proper chop and no individual signature is generally stronger than one with a signature and no chop — which is the opposite of the reflex most foreign counterparts arrive with.

Not one seal but several

  • The company chop, round and red, is the general-purpose one and the one that matters for a commercial contract.
  • The legal representative's chop belongs to the named individual who represents the company in the register.
  • The contract chop, the finance chop and the invoice chop each have a restricted purpose, and a finance chop on a supply contract is a question worth asking.

What to check before you rely on one

  1. That the Chinese characters on the chop match the registered Chinese name of the company exactly — not a trading name, not an English name.
  2. That the entity chopping the contract is the entity that will invoice you and receive your payment. A different name on the bank details is a serious question, not an administrative detail.
  3. That you hold an original or a clear scan of every page that is chopped, and that multi-page contracts are chopped across the pages where that is the practice.
  4. That the business licence you were given names the same entity, with a scope of business that covers what you are buying.

Why this matters more than it seems

Almost every dispute where a foreign company discovers it has no recourse traces back to the same place: the document binds an entity that is not the one holding the assets, or binds nobody at all. The verification takes an afternoon and is the single highest-value piece of due diligence in a China contract.

This is general context and not legal advice. Have a lawyer qualified in Chinese law verify the entity, the chop and the signing authority before a significant commitment.

Questions we get on this.

Is a contract with a signature but no chop valid in China?

It can be, depending on the signer's authority, but it is a much weaker position than a properly chopped contract and it is the first thing a counterparty will contest. The practical rule is to obtain the chop of the correct registered entity and to have the entity verified, rather than to rely on the argument afterwards.